Rajiv Malhotra – Prof. Vaidyanathan interview on ‘Dravidian Identity Politics -EVRamaswamy’;
Why it may accelerate the breaking of Tamilnadu from India?
From
Rajiv Malhotra, I received the following interview by Professor Vaidyanathan on
‘Dravidian Identity Politics -EVRamaswamy’
Subjecting
my previous association with the anti-Brahmin Tamilnadu separatist ideology of
‘Periyar’ EVR, the founder of the Dravidian movement in Tamilnadu;
to the
analysis in the light of my subsequent inter-disciplinary research findings,
involving Physics, Music, ancient Tamil & Sanskrit texts, & Sociology;
I had
shared my discovery on ‘Fringe Mechanism derailing the Indian Nation Building
Process’ (http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2018/04/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none_17.html)
Maniammai
was not E.V. R’s adopted daughter, as mentioned in the beginning of the above
interview.
As
E.V.R was aged and living alone, in 1943 a follower of E.V.R volunteered to
send his daughter Maniammai, aged 25, as caretaker of E.V.R. She was one of the
speakers in the Salem Conference in 1944. She had taken part in 1948 anti-Hindi
struggle and was imprisoned for 2 months. EVR wanted to make his elder
brother’s son E.V.K Samapath his heir to his property and the party. C.N.A
succeeded in thwarting that plan, and E.V.R lost his confidence in Sampath. The
next alternative was his caretaker Maniammai. At that time, according to the
Hindu Law, the only option was to marry her to create a legal heir. The
marriage was registered on 9.7.1949, when E.V.R was aged 70 and Maniammai was
aged 31. E.V.R wrote an explanation on 16.7.1949 in his weekly ‘Kudi Aracu’.
Also
to know more about E.V.R’s services for the welfare of the Dalits, one must go
thru the writings of the front line leaders of Vaikkom struggle, who unable to
progress in the final phase of the struggle, appealed to E.V.R who, to help
them, actively participated with family,
imprisoned. As E.V.R’s father had hosted
the visit of the king to E.V.R’s place Erode, E.V.R was offered a welcome by
the king. E.V.R declined it and participated in the struggle.
During
the Mudukalaththur riots, E.V.R whole heartedly supported the then CM Kamaraj.
The backward castes in the region were angry with E.V.R and opposed E.V.R till
his death. Also ‘Kudi Aracu’ and other journals before Independence, had
reported how E.V.R had supported pro-dalit struggles taking place in various
parts of Tamilnadu. All dalit leaders including Ambedker were his friends.
Suppressing all these primary sources, adopting selective distortion of the
events and speeches of E.V.R, present day writers who are close to foreign
funded N.G.Os try to portray E.V.R as ‘anti-Dalit’, while anti-Hindutva mostly backward caste pro-E.V.R are also patronized by the same N.G.Os.
It is
similar to the current battle between the anti-EVR LTTE and pro-E.V.R
LTTE supporters, both backed by LTTE patrons from the western countries. Who
succeeds in fooling whom, may become clear soon, if Modi govt wakes up to the
unique dimensions of the breaking soft power in TN ? Minus the support of the soft power, the victory of the
hard power will not be long lasting.
In my
view, the above interview will help to break Tamilnadu from India. I have given
below the reasons for my inference. Adopting the social black & white
approach hiding the positive credentials of E.V.R or any leader, will become a self-defeating
exercise.
1.
‘Retired British Indian Civil Service (ICS)
officer Allan Octavian Hume founded the Indian National Congress (A political
party of India (British India to Free India)) in order to form a platform for
civil and political dialogue among educated Indians.’ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Indian_National_Congress)
Since Brahmins were dominating in Madras Presidency, non-Brahmin leaders
in the Congress left the party and formed ‘the South Indian Liberal Federation’
( popularly known as Justice Party) in 1917. Justice party can be compared to
Congress-Khilafat Swaraj Party (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swaraj_Party)
2.
In 1909, two lawyers, P. Subrahmanyam and M.
Purushotham Naidu, announced plans to establish an organisation named "The
Madras Non-Brahmin Association" and recruit a thousand non-Brahmin members
before October 1909. They elicited no response from the non-Brahmin populace
and the organisation never saw the light of the day. Later in 1912, disaffected
non-Brahmin members of the bureaucracy like Saravana Pillai, G. Veerasamy
Naidu, Doraiswami Naidu and S. Narayanaswamy Naidu established the "Madras
United League" with C. Natesa Mudaliar as Secretary. The league restricted
itself to social activities and distanced itself from contemporary politics. On
1 October 1912, the league was reorganised and renamed as the "Madras
Dravidian Association". The association opened many branches in Madras
city. Its main achievement was to establish a hostel for non-Brahmin students.
It also organised annual "At-home" functions for non-Brahmin graduates
and published books presenting their demand.
3.
Due to the persuasion of his close friend
Rajaji, E.V. Ramasamy joined the Indian National Congress in 1919 after
quitting his business and resigning from public posts. wholeheartedly undertook
constructive programs spreading the use of Khadi, picketing toddy shops,
boycotting shops selling foreign cloth, and eradicating untouchability. In
1921, Periyar courted imprisonment for picketing toddy shops in Erode. When his
wife as well as his sister joined the agitation, it gained momentum, and the
administration was forced to come to a compromise. He was again arrested during
the Non-Cooperation movement and the Temperance movement.[6] In 1922, Periyar
was elected the President of the Madras Presidency Congress Committee during
the Tirupur session, where he advocated strongly for reservation in government
jobs and education. His attempts were defeated in the Congress party due to a
strong presence of discrimination and indifference, which led to his leaving
the party in 1925. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periyar_E._V._Ramasamy) During the above period. EVR opposed the
Justice Party. Brahmins supporting
social justice served as ministers, when Justice Party was in power.
4.
In 1925 EVR started the ‘self-respect movement’
and published Tamil weekly ‘Kudi Aracu’ and an English Journal. Marx-Engle’s
‘Manifesto of the Communist Party’ was translated into Tamil and published;
followed by their other writings in Tamil, punished with fines, confiscation of
the journals, imprisonment during the colony rule. In December 1931 he
undertook a tour of Europe, accompanied by S. Ramanathan and Erode Ramu, to
personally acquaint himself with their political systems, social movements, way
of life, economic and social progress and administration of public bodies. He
visited Egypt, Greece, Turkey, Russia, Germany, England, Spain, France and
Portugal, staying in Russia for three months. On his return journey he halted
at Ceylon and returned to India in November 1932.
5.
On 11 August 1937, within a month of becoming
the CM of Madras Presidency, Rajaji announced compulsory Hindi teaching in the
schools, and in spite of the opposition from the pro-Tamil forums and the
Justice Party, on 21 April
1938, Rajaji went ahead and passed a government order (G.O) making the teaching
of Hindi compulsory in 125 Secondary schools in the Presidency. Tamil scholars
like Maraimalai Adigal, Somasundara Bharathi, K. Appadurai, Mudiyarasan, K. A.
P. Viswanatham and Ilakkuvanar opposed it.
In
December 1937, Tamil Saivite scholars were among the first to announce their
opposition to the Hindi teaching in the Saiva Sidhandha Maha Samaja conference
at Velur. Women also participated in the agitation in large numbers. Moovalur
Ramamirtham, Narayani, Va. Ba. Thamaraikani, Munnagar Azhagiyar, Dr. S.
Dharmambal, Malar Mugathammaiyar, Pattammal and Seethammal were some of the
women who were arrested for participating in the agitation. On 13 November
1938, the Tamil Nadu Women's Conference was convened to demonstrate women's
support for the movement.Despite the anti-Brahmin sentiments of the backers of
the agitation, a few Brahmins like Kanchi Rajagopalachari also participated in
the movement. The Tamil speaking Muslims in the Madras presidency supported the
agitation (in contrast to the Urdu speaking Muslims, who supported the
propagation of Hindi). In August–September 1938, a protest march was jointly
organised by the Self-Respect movement and the Muslim league. In the next 42 days, the marchers
covered 234 villages and 60 towns. They addressed 87 public meetings and
received widespread coverage in the press. They reached Madras on 11 September
1938 and were arrested for picketing government offices. The march succeeded in
raising anti-Hindi and pro-Tamil support in smaller towns and villages. For the
first time, the separation demand ‘Tamilnadu for Tamils’ was announced by EVR,
weakening the developing
Indian identity among the Tamils; while precolonial diverse identity all over
in India was undergoing the transformation towards the anti-colonial Indian
identity. The
following statement in the Indian Constitution Assembly was delivered, by the
nationalist. T.T.
Krishnamachari:
“This kind
of intolerance makes us fear that the strong Centre which we need, a strong
Centre which is necessary will also mean the enslavement of people who do not
speak the language of the legislature, the language of the Centre. I would,
Sir, convey a warning on behalf of the people of the South for the reason that
there are already elements in South India who want separation and it is up to
us to tax the maximum strength we have to keeping those elements down, and my
honourable friends in U.P. do not help us in anyway by flogging their idea
‘Hindi Imperialism’ to the maximum extend possible.”- T.T. Krishnamachari; http://www.languageinindia.com/april2006/constituentassemblylastdays.pdf
)
Only through the social dynamics of the identity related social energy development, one can understand the magnitude of this damage in TN. (‘Is the Language Policy derailing the nation building process in India?’; http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2017/06/is-language-policy-derailing-nation.html)
Only through the social dynamics of the identity related social energy development, one can understand the magnitude of this damage in TN. (‘Is the Language Policy derailing the nation building process in India?’; http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2017/06/is-language-policy-derailing-nation.html)
Lord
Erskine, the then Governor of Madras wrote to Viceroy Linlithgow in July 1938
that "Compulsory Hindi has been the cause of great trouble in this
province and is certainly contrary to the wishes of the bulk of the population.
On 29 October 1939, Rajaji's Congress Government resigned protesting the
involvement of India in the Second World War. Madras provincial government was
placed under Governor's rule. On 31 October, Periyar suspended the agitation
and asked the Governor to withdraw the compulsory Hindi order.[29] On 21
February 1940, Governor Erskine, issued a press communique withdrawing
compulsory Hindi teaching and making it optional (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Hindi_agitation_of_1937%E2%80%9340)
6. EVR was elected as the leader of the Justice
party in 1938, while he was in prison for the anti-Hindi agitation. Under the
influence of C.N.Annadurai, in 1944 EVR transformed Justice Party as non-electoral
party “Dravidar Kazhagam’, expelling all the leaders of the Justice Party. The
linguistic, Geographic related word ‘Dravidar’ suffered semantic racial
distortion acquiring ‘anti-Brahmin’ dimension. In terms of honesty and religious faith; Justice Party and
DMK/DK are disjoint.
7. After the resignation of Rajaji as CM, the governor invited E.V.R the
president of Justice party to form the govt. Rajaji tried to persuade his close
friend E.V.R to accept the offer. But E.V.R declined it. (Ananda Vikatan
interview 04-04-1965; http://www.keetru.com/index.php/homepage/2009-10-07-11-18-55/3355-periyar-muzhakkam-feb2014)
Before Independence Rajaji supported the ‘Dravida Nadu Separation’ demand of EVR.
Before Independence Rajaji supported the ‘Dravida Nadu Separation’ demand of EVR.
"We
going to soon get the cooperation of my friend and comrade, Acharya
(Rajagopalachari), for the separation of Dravida Nadu. Not only him, but all
Brahmins ... are going to support our demand for separation"- Periyar EVR
; http://en.wikiedia.org/wiki/C._R._formula
8.
After Independence, in the 1952 general
election of the Madras Presidency, the Congress Party contested in 367 seats
and won 152. MuthuRamalinga Devar, a
staunch pro- INA nationalist tried to form the govt, grouping all non-congress
MLAs. (https://ta.wikipedia.org/wiki/) De-railing MuthuRamalinga Devar’s
efforts and introducing the political disease of defection, Rajaji became the
CM.
9.
Late M.P.SivagnAnam, in his biography, had
recorded that the TN congress declined to pass a condolence resolution, when
great nationalist V.O.Chidambaram Pillai died. V.O.C, Subramaniya Bharathiyar
and other leaders who opposed Gandhi were ignored by the pro-Gamdhi
nationalists. Inspired by the Nehru dynasty, that strategy was later adopted by M.Karunanidhi to convert DMK
into his family party.
Rajaji and the D.M.K leader C.N.Annadurai instigated the 1965 anti-Hindi agitation involving the students, and E.V.R opposed it, as revealed in the above mentioned ‘Ananda Vikatan’ interview
Rajaji and the D.M.K leader C.N.Annadurai instigated the 1965 anti-Hindi agitation involving the students, and E.V.R opposed it, as revealed in the above mentioned ‘Ananda Vikatan’ interview
Rajaji
was mainly responsible for strengthening anti-Indian pro-Tamil Identity in
Tamilnadu and DMK capturing power in 1967 and M.K becoming CM in 1969. Rajaji’s role was pro-active and E.V.R’s role was reactive.
None of the pro-Gandhi TN congress leaders including Rajaji, suffered imprisonment, confiscation of journals and intimidation from the govt, like E.V.R during the colony rule. None of them had conducted meeting in most of the towns and villages in TN like E.V.R. Moreover after entering into the public life, E.V.R abandoned his rich life style, and started travelling in buses and third class train, till he was healthy even in his old age.
A study of ‘Kudi Aracu’(Tamil Weekly), would reveal that EVR (prior to DK phase) published the criticisms from his dissidents like Jeeva, Muthusamy Vallaththaracu, etc WITHOUT EDITING , and replied to them. Unfortunately, the Tamil scholars close to E.V.R failed to refute his arguments against the ancient Tamil texts. Hence the unbelievable social energy developed by E.V.R damaged Tamil & Tamil identity. The social disruption, depression, suicide, drug use, disrespecting the elders, etc currently witnessed among the educated youth in TN, may be due to the above damages caused by E.V.R unaware of his intellectual limitations w.r.t the study of the ancient Tamil texts.
Present TN BJP seems to be spineless to protect the Tamil interests in Modi Govt. For example, some mischievous official in the postal recruitment discontinued Tamil in the recruitment exams. Had TN BJP initiated a prompt representation, the damage would have been rectified, proving its pro-Tamil credentials. Instead both DMK & AIADMK raised the issue in the parliament and earned the fame for undoing the damage. Now there is case pending in the high court with the prayer demanding the Tamil translation of the New Education Policy. Demand for ASI Keezadi excavation in TN was raised for more than 40 years. Only after Modi becoming P.M, the excavation started. Later some mischievous officials, like those in the postal dept, derailed the excavation. While TN BJP was sleeping w.r.t this issue, anti-Modi forces succeeded in forcing the A.S.I to give permission, that too delegating the task to the TN Govt. The above process had strengthened the soft power for breaking TN from India. Had TN BJP grasped the initiative and ensured the continuance of the excavation, it would have weakened the above negative soft power, and strengthened the nation building in TN.
None of the pro-Gandhi TN congress leaders including Rajaji, suffered imprisonment, confiscation of journals and intimidation from the govt, like E.V.R during the colony rule. None of them had conducted meeting in most of the towns and villages in TN like E.V.R. Moreover after entering into the public life, E.V.R abandoned his rich life style, and started travelling in buses and third class train, till he was healthy even in his old age.
A study of ‘Kudi Aracu’(Tamil Weekly), would reveal that EVR (prior to DK phase) published the criticisms from his dissidents like Jeeva, Muthusamy Vallaththaracu, etc WITHOUT EDITING , and replied to them. Unfortunately, the Tamil scholars close to E.V.R failed to refute his arguments against the ancient Tamil texts. Hence the unbelievable social energy developed by E.V.R damaged Tamil & Tamil identity. The social disruption, depression, suicide, drug use, disrespecting the elders, etc currently witnessed among the educated youth in TN, may be due to the above damages caused by E.V.R unaware of his intellectual limitations w.r.t the study of the ancient Tamil texts.
The Tamil identity bungling of EVR benefited DMK to
appropriate the social energy of E.V.R, and subjugate anti-India Tamil identity
to selfish political interests of DMK.
“Because of the close links between
language and identity, if people begin to think of their language as useless,
they see their identity as such as well. This leads to social disruption,
depression, suicide and drug use, he says. And as parents no longer transmit
language to their children, the connection between children and grandparents is
broken and traditional values are lost.” (http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8311000/8311069.stm)
One who tries to undo the damages need to
lead simple and honest life like E.V.R, and objectively criticize his views
that caused the damages, while recognizing E.V.R’s sacrifices. From 2005, I have
been doing it. ‘Periyar’ party leaders did not refute my criticisms till now.
But after Rajiv Malhotra’s entry into the TN public space against the Dravidian
Movement & E.V.R, ‘Periyar’ party leaders had started publishing books, articles
and conducted meetings with the evidences mostly in Tamil, easily refuting Rajiv
Malhotra’s arguments that followed the social black & white approach hiding the
positive credentials of E.V.R. The social black & white approach will
divide the people to the advantage of the vested interests, looting Tamilnadu.
DMK’s subjugated anti-India Tamil identity, divorced the
Tamil intellectual dimension and strengthened the emotional dimension
transforming it to a new kind of language drug; ‘Dravidian Blue Whale social
menace’ - http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2017/09/spreading-blue-whale-in-tn-corruption.html
Present TN BJP seems to be spineless to protect the Tamil interests in Modi Govt. For example, some mischievous official in the postal recruitment discontinued Tamil in the recruitment exams. Had TN BJP initiated a prompt representation, the damage would have been rectified, proving its pro-Tamil credentials. Instead both DMK & AIADMK raised the issue in the parliament and earned the fame for undoing the damage. Now there is case pending in the high court with the prayer demanding the Tamil translation of the New Education Policy. Demand for ASI Keezadi excavation in TN was raised for more than 40 years. Only after Modi becoming P.M, the excavation started. Later some mischievous officials, like those in the postal dept, derailed the excavation. While TN BJP was sleeping w.r.t this issue, anti-Modi forces succeeded in forcing the A.S.I to give permission, that too delegating the task to the TN Govt. The above process had strengthened the soft power for breaking TN from India. Had TN BJP grasped the initiative and ensured the continuance of the excavation, it would have weakened the above negative soft power, and strengthened the nation building in TN.
True,
foreign funded Christian NGOs support anti-Modi groups and parties in TN. But
the ground was prepared for them by Rajaji & Gandhi. Now TN BJP is indirectly helping them, by not
safeguarding Tamil interests in the Modi govt, and insulting mass leaders like
EVR & C.N.A. This trend, if
unchecked, will break Tamil Nadu from India.
Note: Criticisms refuting Dr. R. Nagaswamy’s views on Tamil, Tamil Music and
ThirukkuRaL, are published mostly in Tamil. Unlike Iravatham Mahadevan
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iravatham_Mahadevan), Dr. R. Nagaswamy’s views
with the subjective bias, is resurrecting the otherwise dying anti-Sanskrit
trend in Tamilnadu. Hence, I like to encourage scholarly dialogue on the views
of Dr. R. Nagaswamy.
(http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2019/09/is-nagaswamy-aware-of-thephonetic.html)
(http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2019/09/is-nagaswamy-aware-of-thephonetic.html)
Also read: ‘The Dravidian Movement & Rescuing
Tamilnadu’;