Tuesday, October 22, 2013



The Pitfalls in the Study & Translation of the Ancient Tamil Texts (18)


    How Abraham Pandithar was wrong in identifying ET          

   as the vattap pAlai - வட்டப் பாலை?



      As a pioneer in the modern period to explore ancient Tamil texts to discover ancient Tamil music , Abraham Pandhithar(AP)  seemed to be first person to apply the consonant frequency vibrating length ratios ( Sa-Pa 2/3 & Sa –Ma 3/4 ) as revealed in his book ‘karuNamirtha sAgaram’ (KS)( Page 512-513). Also unlike Vipulananda Adigal(VA)  who undertook the similar calculations and bypassed the resulting problem, AP identified and discussed it in the above reference. 

     Also unlike VA, AP seemed to be following the developments in Western Music closely, as he was an expert both in western music and Karnatic music. 

      We had seen in the previous post the following points suggesting that VA did not seem to follow the developments in Western Music, though he was a science graduate from the University of London.

(1)  Like the Karnatic Music Scholar Prof.P.Sambamoorthy), VA did not seem to be aware (based on ‘yAzh nhool’) that “in 1939, an international conference recommended that the A above middle C be tuned to 440 Hz, now known as concert pitch.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_pitch_standards_in_Western_music#History_of_pitch_standards_in_Western_music ).

(2)  In just Intonation, middle C shall be tuned to 264Hz, following A = 440Hz. Instead VA had used the tuning fork frequency 256 Hz (used for Physics-Acoustics experiments) in his calculations of the frequencies of the pitches of the musical notes.

(3)  VA did not seem to be aware of the corrections involved in calculating the vibrating length of air columns, as mentioned in the previous post.

Surprisingly AP was so closely following the developments in the western music, he explored if Equal Temperament in the Western music would solve the above mentioned problems he had encountered.

Note that though the history of the discovery of Equal Temperament started from the 4th century B.C, its world wide adoption replacing Just Intonation started from the first decade of the 19th century “completing only in the second decade of the 19th century.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_temperament). 

Probably AP was one of the very few early Indian writers who wrote about Equal Temperament (ET) in his book published in 1917 and explained the method of calculating the frequency ratios of the musical notes.

Also AP was right that ET solved the problems in the calculations he had encountered. In fact the success of ET over the Just Intonation was due to such advantages including solving the difficulty with respect to modulation in the Just Intonation.

Unfortunately AP was tempted to identifying the Equal Temperament as the vattap pAlai - வட்டப் பாலை of the ancient Tamil Music.

After explaining the logarithmic calculation of the frequency ratios for the 12 semitones in the middle octave and how it solved the problems with respect to the consonant relations, he concluded that ET could be identified as the vattap pAlai  (Page 833 KS) of the ancient Tamil music.

Unfortunately AP did not seem to be aware of the short comings of ET briefed below.

Consonant intervals play a significant role in good music. In ET, except the octave, “not a single one is in perfect tune” (‘Science & Music’ (1937) by Sir James Jeans, page 176; ‘Physics of Music’(1944)  by Alexander Wood Page 193). Also it was proved in these references that unlike ET music instruments like Harmonium, organ, etc, violinists & vocalists always follow Just Intonation. Of course all these references were published after the life time of AP and hence AP could not be blamed for not being aware of the above results.

AP was aware that ET was just an approximation in following the consonant relations in music. Unfortunately AP concluded that the consonant relations could not be applied to the ancient Tamil Music. (Page 503 KS). In fact he called those ratios as ‘mOtta aLavu” - மோட்டா அளவு (Page 506 KS).But AP was honest to admit that the ancient Tamil texts insisted that the ancient Tamil music system should follow Sa-Pa & Sa-Ma methods.(Pages 717-818,KS).

In fact tuning in ancient Tamil Music was done using the octave, Sa-Pa & Sa-Ma relations, according to a formula cited in pancha marapu and it was explained in my doctoral thesis referred in the previous post.

Those experienced in tuning the string instruments knew that while tuning for the fifth above, even minute changes in the tension of the string above or below the right tension will cause dissonance. It was also proved through the experiments. (‘Physics of Music’, Pages 157, 164). Hence ET , in view of its imperfect fifth, could not be used for tuning as explained in pancha marapu. 

Also vattap pAlai  explained in chilappathikAram , u.ve.cA - சிலப்பதிகாரம் உ.வெ.சா (232,439,449) , was an interesting method, involving the 12 semi tonal points in a circle employing the cycle of fifth both clock-wise and anti clock-wise for the modulation.

Hence AP’s identification of ET as the vattap pAlai could not be justified based on the evidences in the ancient Tamil texts.

Disproving the research findings of AP & VA could not be viewed as defaming their research. It needs to be viewed as the progress in research.

Even in science, the great prestige of the scientists delayed the acceptance of findings that over ruled earlier ones, as briefed below.

“For more than 100 years, Newton's corpuscular theory of light was favored over the wave theory, partly because of Newton's great prestige and partly because not enough experimental evidence existed to provide an adequate basis of comparison between the two theories. Finally, important experiments were done on the diffraction and interference of light by Thomas Young (1801) and A. J. Fresnel (1814–15) that could only be interpreted in terms of the wave theory. The polarization of light was still another phenomenon that could only be explained by the wave theory. Thus, in the 19th cent. the wave theory became the dominant theory of the nature of light. “(http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/science/light-the-nature-light.html )

But in the light of conclusive evidences, the acceptance of the right findings became inevitable in science.

One of the reasons for not taking advantage of the developments in Music Information technology to develop marketable products related to Indian music like the innumerable products related to western music, seem to be the ‘great prestige’ of the personalities and theories preventing open minded scientific enquiry in music.

Compared to Hindustani Music and Karnatic Music, Tamil Music seems to be suffering more from subjective emotional approach, preventing its development, as explained in ‘ Tavaraana Disaiyil Tamizhisai Aarvam’ - தவறான திசையில் தமிழிசை ஆர்வம்  (http://www.musicresearch.in/categorydetails.php?imgid=82 ).

I had witnessed that the present youth learning music had started raising boldly controversial questions with respect to the pitch problems in Karnatic Music. Hence I am optimistic that the constraints preventing open minded scientific enquiry will die soon to open the gateway to new areas of employment and business,  exploiting the rich potential of the ancient Indian music.

------------------------------------------



    

Thursday, October 17, 2013

The Pitfalls in the Study & Translation of the Ancient Tamil Texts 


Tamil Intellectual Domain- Inconvenient Questions

 


When emotions dominate over reason elevating the scholars to the status of demigod, then the reasonable questions related to their research findings become inconvenient. When the inconvenient questions were buried without discussion, it would initiate process of the intellectual stagnation culminating in intellectual decay later.

The sources of the unbelievable decay in Tamil (explained in the earlier posts including 
'தமிழாராய்ச்சியில் நடைபெறும் தவறுகளும், தமிழுக்கான விடுதலையும்') could be traced to the inconvenient questions related to the researches in Tamil. Let us face those questions now.'

     1.How did Vipulananda Adigal  (VA) ignore the research of Abiraham Pandithar (AP) with   respect to the pitch frequency calculations, which in turn, resulted in the pitfall of his research?

First a brief note on the pitfall in the research of Vipulananda Adigal   with respect to his calculations on the frequencies of the pitches of the musical notes, explained in his book ‘yAzh nhool ‘ (1950).

Among the seven music notes (with their names)  (1) Sa – ச- kural- குரல் , (2) Re – ரி- thuththam-துத்தம், (3) Ga – க- kaikkiLai- கைக்கிளை, (4) Ma – ம- uzhai- உழை, (5) Pa – ப- iLi-இளி, (6) Dha – த- viLari-விளரி , (7) Ne – நி- thAram-தாரம்,  the relation between Sa – ச and  Pa – ப was known as the consonance fifth relation. By multiplying the frequency of the pitch of the music note Sa by 3/2, one could obtain the frequency of the pitch of the fifth above music note Pa. Similarly the fifth note above any music mote could be obtained by multiplying its frequency by 3/2.

Assuming the frequency ratio of Ne as 1, VA started applying the above multiplying by 3/2 to get the frequency ratios of all other notes landing in a problem of the value 2.1357 instead of 2 with respect to the next higher octave music note Ne. Instead of attending and explaining the problem, VA applied the octave relation to get the value 2, by-passing the problem.

Evidences in ‘KaruNamirtha sAgaram’ (Page 512) confirmed that Abraham Pandithar (AP) undertook the above calculations and identified the above problem.There was no reference in 'yAzh nhool ‘ (1950) published in Thanjavur about the ancient Tamil Music researches of Abraham Pandithar published ( in Thanjavur)  in his book ‘KaruNamirtha sAgaram’(1917). Had VA referred to the findings of AP with respect to the calculations of the consonant fifth, he might not have committed the above mistake.

Also strangely, based on ‘yAzh nool’, VA, a science graduate from the University of London, (like the Karnatic Music Scholar Prof.P.Sambamoorthy) was not aware that “in 1939, an international conference recommended that the A above middle C be tuned to 440 Hz, now known as concert pitch.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_pitch_standards_in_Western_music#History_of_pitch_standards_in_Western_music ).

In just Intonation, middle C shall be tuned to 264Hz, following A = 440Hz. Instead VA had used the tuning fork frequency 256 Hz in his calculations with few short comings, as I had proved in my doctoral thesis ‘Physics of Tamil Music’ (1996), later published in ‘'தமிழ் இசையியல் - புதிய கண்டுபிடிப்புகள் ( thamizh icaiyiyal – puthiya kaNtupitippukaL 2009, சேகர் பதிப்பகம் – Sekar Pathippakam, Chennai  சென்னை ) .

      2.    How did Vipulananda Adigal   ignore the research of Abiraham Pandithar with respect to identifying the Tamil word for the music note ‘sa- ச‌’, which in turn, resulted in his wrongly identifying ‘iLi- இளி ‘as ‘Sa- ச‌ ’?
We had seen that the seven music notes are (1) Sa – ச- kural- குரல் , (2) Re – ரி- thuththam-துத்தம், (3) Ga – க- kaikkiLai- கைக்கிளை, (4) Ma – ம- uzhai- உழை, (5) Pa – ப- iLi-இளி, (6) Dha – த- viLari-விளரி , (7) Ne – நி- thAram-தாரம்,  ‘ kural- குரல்’ was identified as the musical term for ‘ Sa – ச’ by AP, the first scholar in the modern period to explore the ancient Tamil texts for Tamil Music research.  (‘KaruNamirtha sAgaram’ (Page 527). Also ancient texts like thivAkara nhikaNtu -   திவாகர நிகண்டு, mahAbhAratha chUdAmani -மகாபாரத சூடாமணி, paratha cangkirakam - பரத சங்கிரகம் had arrived at the same result.( பஞ்ச மரபில் இசை மரபு – pancha marapil icai marapu, E.AngaiyaRkaNNi,  இ.அங்கையற்கண்ணி , page - பக்கம் 66 )

 Ignoring all the above references, VA had identified ‘iLi- இளி ‘ as ‘Sa- ச‌ ’, and he had explained five kinds of reasons for it. I had disproved them with proper evidences in my doctoral thesis ‘Physics of Tamil Music’ (1996), later published in ‘'தமிழ் இசையியல் - புதிய கண்டுபிடிப்புகள் ( thamizh icaiyiyal – puthiya kaNtupitippukaL 2009) .
  

3. What were the defects in the calculation of the frequency value of Sa in the flute referred in ‘pancha marapu’ , undertaken in ‘yazh nhool’ by VA?

Details about the defects as well as the right method of calculating the frequency were explained in my thesis referred above. Briefly the defects are


(1)  While calculating the vibrating length of the air column, VA did not consider the anti-node at the center of the seventh hole and do the necessary correction.

(2)  VA did not do the end correction while calculating the vibrating length of the air column.

(3)  VA did not consider the temperature dependence on the velocity of sound in air and use the appropriate value.

(4)  VA did not use the international pitch standard value in his calculations.

(5)  VA did not bother to note the differences between the calculated frequency values and the tuning fork frequency values he had used for the calculation and offer explanations.

(6)  VA had needlessly assumed the value of 81 C.M for the middle octave –Madhya Sthayi Ne complicating the calculations ending in the pitfalls. Instead he could have followed simple multiplication of 3/2 for frequency ratio for the fifth as done by AP.


Had he followed any Physics book related to acoustics available during his period, VA might not have committed the above mistakes. .Just praising any research finding without bothering to understand the content as well as its validity will not help any development in research. Instead it will lead to intellectual decay in the related field, one unfortunate result of elevating the scholars to the status of demigod.






     Note: If anyone or more of the above ‘inconvenient questions’ were raised before and clarified
                – I shall be thankful to anyone who could draw my attention to it.


Tamil scholarship, in the digital age, is becoming inter-disciplinary, with the scope for developing new marketable products. With the introduction of spell check, grammar check, and search options of Lexicon and the commentaries, Tamil literate scholars in science and technology, bypassing the duration to acquire the traditional Tamil scholarship, could subject the ancient Tamil texts to inter-disciplinary research.

'DECODING ANCIENT TAMIL TEXTS – THE PITFALLS IN THE STUDY & TRANSLATION'

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07T8QV6RT/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=DECODING+ANCIENT+TAMIL+TEXTS+%E2%80%93+THE+PITFALLS+IN+THE+STUDY+%26+TRANSLATION&qid=1561275540&s=digital-text&sr=1-1



 

Thursday, June 6, 2013

RªZôWônf£«p SûPùTßm RYßLÞm,
RªÝdLô] ®ÓRûXÙm ( 1 )

                      

RLYp ùRô¯pÖhT Y[of£ ( Developments in Information Technology) LôWQUôLÜm, L¦² ùUô¯«V­லிp ( Computational Linguistics) HtThÓ YÚm Y[of£ LôWQUôLÜm RªZWônf£«p ùTÚm Uôt\eLs SûPùTßm Yônl×Ls ùY°fNj§tÏ YkÕs[] . Rªr BWônf£L°p Es[ RYßLû[ AûPVô[m LiÓ , Lh£L°u/RûXYoL°u ùNpYôd¡p AÕ GqYôß A¥ûUlThÓs[Õ GuTûR A±kÕ  , AYtû\ R®Ó ùTô¥Vôd¡ A±®Vp þ ùRô¯pÖhT Y[of£ûVl TVuTÓj§ Rªr GqYôß Y[of£l TôûR«p TV¦dL Es[Õ  GuTûR CjùRôPo ®[dÏ¡\Õ.

                                      
EûPûUÙQoÜ (possessiveness) RûPLs

RªrSôh¥p RUÕ BnÜ Ø¥ÜLs Utßm Rôm HtßdùLôiP ¨ûXlTôÓLs B¡VûY ÁÕ  EûPûUÙQoÜ (possessiveness) ùTÚmTôXô] Rªr A±OoL°PØm, CûN A±OoL°PØm CÚd¡\Õ.  EûPûUÙQoÜ GuTÕ JÚ TôÕLôl× EQoûY HtTÓjRYpXRôÏm. AkR  EûPûUÙQoÜ RLodLlThPôp áPúY AÕ TôÕLôl©uûU EQoûYÙm HtTÓj§®Óm. RUÕ BnÜ Ø¥ÜLs Utßm Rôm HtßdùLôiP ¨ûXlTôÓLs B¡VYt±tÏ G§Wô] Rªr, Rª¯ûN NmTkRlThP BnÜ Ø¥ÜLû[ NôoTt\(OBJECTIVE) Øû\«p T¬º­லிdL ùTÚmTôXô] Rªr A±OoL°PØm, CûN A±OoL°PØm Es[ EûPûUÙQoÜ RûPVôL CÚd¡\Õ. SpX SiToL[ô«ÚkRYoLs JÚY¬u BnÜØ¥ûY Ut\Yo HtßdùLôs[ôRRôp, ShûT رjÕdùLôiÓ, JÚYûWùVôÚYo ùYßjÕ YôrkRûRd LiP AàTYØm G]dÏ EiÓ.

Uû\kR Rªr CûN A±Oo Å.Tô.L. ÑkRWm RUÕ BWônf£ êXm ØRp Ti ØpûX Guß Ø¥Ü ùNnRôo. AYÚPu ùSÚdLUô] Sh©p CÚkR CûN A±Oo ×Wh£ RôNu RUÕ BWônf£«p ØRp Ti ϱg£ Guß Ø¥Ü ùNnRôo. JÚYo Ø¥ûY Cuù]ôÚYo Htßd ùLôs[ UßjRRôp Sh× Ø±kÕ CÚYÚdϪûPúV ùYßl× Y[okRÕ. CÚYÚúU Gu²Pm ©¬VØPu TZ¡V StTiTô[oLs.

Å.Tô.L. ÑkRWm N Gu\ CûNfÑWj§tÏ T CûQ GuT§p SmTØ¥VôR A[ÜdÏ EûPûUÙQoÜ ùLôi¥ÚkRôo. Nþ ÜdÏ T ¡û[ E\®p CÚlTûRÙm , úUpvRô« þ Y­லிÜ Rô]m (Higher Octave) N CûQ E\®p CÚlTûRÙm RÏkR NôußLÞPu Sôu LiP±kúRu. AY¬u ShûT رjÕd ùLôs[ ®ÚmTôRXôp, AmØ¥Ü ùRôPoTô] LhÓûWûV AYo Uû\kR ©u Rôu ùY°«húPu.

YûW¨ûXLû[j (limitations) Rôi¥V Ø¥ÜLs


CkR EûPûUÙQo®u LôWQUôL, RUdÏ ¡ûPd¡u\ NôußL°u YûW¨ûXLs(limitations) Tt± BWôVôUp, YûW¨ûXLû[j Rôi¥V Ø¥ÜLû[ Rªr A±OoLs ùTß¡\ôoLs.

ERôWQUôL, ÏUWÏÚTW vYôªLs RUÕ TôPpL°p "NXôm, ùNôdLôn' úTôu\ CkÕvRô² ùNôtLû[l TVuTÓj§Ùs[ôo Guß JÚ Nôuß úTWô. S.Ngº®«u TôoûYdÏ YÚ¡\Õ. ÏUWÏÚTW vYôªLs YôrkR LôXm 17Bm èt\ôiÓ Gu\ Nôußm, RªrSôh¥p CvXôm URm 14þBm èt\ôi¥u ÕYdLj§p A±ØLUô]Õ Gu\ Nôußm AY¬u TôoûYdÏ YÚ¡u\]. CûPlThP LôXj§p GÝRlThP GÝjÕdL°p CkÕvRô² ùNôtLs CPm ùTt\Õ ApXÕ ùT\®pûX GuTÕ Ï±jR NôußLs AYo TôoûYdÏ YWôR ¨ûX«p, ÏUWÏÚTW vYôªL°u TôPpL°p Rôu CkÕvRô² ùNôtLs ØRp ØRXôL CPm ùTt\] Gu\ Ø¥ûYl ùT\Ø¥VôÕ. CÕ AYÚdÏ ¡ûPjR NôußL°u YûW¨ûXLs BÏm. CkR YûW¨ûXLs Tt±d LYûXlTPôUp AYo '' On the basis of this evidence, it is clear that it will take about two to three centuries for the foreign words to enter into the language of the native soil"
(TdLm 84, Rª¯Vp LhÓûWLs) (""CkRf Nôu±u A¥lTûP«p, ùNôkR Ui¦u ùUô¯«p Ak¨V ùNôtLs ÖûZV CWiÓ ØRp êuß èt\ôiÓLs BÏm GuTÕ ùR°Yô¡\Õ.'') Guß Ø¥Ü ùNn¡\ôo.

YûW¨ûXLs(limitations) Tt±d LYûXlTPôUp AYo Rôu ùTt\ Ø¥®u A¥lTûP«p úUÛm JÚ Ø¥ûYl ùTß¡\ôo. AÓjÕ ARû] TôojRôp RªZôWônf£«p SûPùTßm RYßLs úUÛm ùR°YôÏm.

RªrSôh¥p Nmv¡ÚRm úTÑm B¬VoLs ¡.Ø.7þBm èt\ôi¥p YkRôoLs Guß úTWô.V.WeLôfNô¬Vôo ùR¬®jR LÚjûR úTWô. S.Ngº® HtßdùLôiÓ ( TdLm 84, AúR èp) úUúX ùNôu] Ø¥®u A¥lTûP«p AÓjÕ JÚ Ød¡V Ø¥ûYl ùTßYRtLô] YôRjûRj ÕYeÏ¡\ôo. B]ôp ÕYdLj§úXúV JÚ ùSÚPp.

RªrSôh¥p Nmv¡ÚRm úTÑm B¬VoLs ÖûZkR LôXm Tt±V BnÜL°p Guù]u] LÚjÕ úYßTôÓLs Es[], AYt±p úTWô.V.WeLôfNô¬Vôo ùR¬®jR LÚjûR úTWô. S.Ngº® HtßdùLôsYRtLô] ¨VôVeLs Gu] GuTÕ Tt± AYo HÕm ϱl©P®pûX GuTúR AkR ùSÚPXôÏm.

AÓjÕ ùRôpLôl©Vo LôXj§p Rôu NUv¡ÚRf ùNôtLs Rª¯p ÖûZkRRôL CYo GÓjR Ø¥®û]l TVuTÓj§ Ru YôRjûR AYo ùRôPo¡\ôo.  (CmØ¥Üm AYo RY\ôLúY GÓjÕs[ôo GuTûR G]Õ "JÃCþ £X IVeLs' LhÓûW«p http://www.musicresearch.in/categorydetails.php?imgid=83) ®[d¡Ùsú[u.

RªrSôh¥p Nmv¡ÚRm úTÑm B¬VoLs ¡.Ø.7þBm èt\ôi¥p YkRôoLs. CkÕvRô² ùUô¯fùNôtLs 2 ØRX 3 èt\ôiÓLs L¯jÕ  17Bm èt\ôi¥p Rª¯p ÖûZkR]. ùRôpLôl©Vo LôXj§p Rôu NUv¡ÚRf ùNôtLs Rª¯p ÖûZkR]. G]úY ùRôpLôl©Vo YôrkR LôXm ¡.Ø. 4þBm èt\ôiÓ. CÕúY úTWô. S.Ngº® ùTt\ Ø¥Ü.(TdLm 84, AúR èp)

JÚ NØLj§u ùNôkR ùUô¯«p Ak¨V ùUô¯f ùNôtLs GqY[Ü LôXj§p ÖûZYÕ GuTÕ AkR NêLj§u ùUô¯ NmTkRlThP TiTôhÓ RLYp T¬Uôt\ Y[of£ ¨ûX Es°hP TX LôW¦Lû[l(several factors) ùTôßjRRôÏm. CÕ JÚ LôXd LhPj§­ÚkÕ Cuù]ôÚ LôXd LhPj§p Uô\dá¥V Yônl× Es[RôÏm.

YôRj§tLôL CkÕvRô² ùUô¯fùNôtLs Tt± CYo GÓjR Ø¥Ü N¬ùVußm, RªrSôh¥p Nmv¡ÚRm úTÑm B¬VoLs ¡.Ø.7þBm èt\ôi¥p YkRôoLs GuTÕ N¬ùVußm ûYjÕdùLôsúYôm.¡.Ø.7þBm èt\ôi¥Ûm, ¡.©. 17Bm èt\ôi¥Ûm ( 24 èt\ôiÓ) CûPùY°«p NêLj§p RLYp T¬Uôt\ Øû\«Ûm, CÕ NmTkRlThP Aû]jÕ LôW¦L°Ûm GkR Uôt\Øm SûPùT\®pûX GuTÕ  EiûUVô]ôp UhÓúU úTWô. S.Ngº® úUtùNôu] Ø¥ûYl ùT\ CVÛm.

Ko ERôWQj§tLôLj Rôu úTWô. S.Ngº®«u BnÜ GÓjÕdùLôs[l ThPúR R®W, AY¬u Rªrl ×XûUûV, Rªrj ùRôiûPd Ïû\jÕ U§l©PúYiÓm Gu\ úSôdLm GÕÜm G]dÏ CpûX. Rªr, Rª¯ûN Tt±V ùTÚmTôXô] BnÜL°p CjRûLV NôoTô](subjective) RYßLs Es[] GuTRtÏ CÕ Ko ERôWQUôL UhÓúU TVuTÓjRlThPÕ. CjRûLV Rªr/Rªr CûN Tt±V BnÜL°p Es[ RYßLû[l Tt± ùRôPoY¬ûN èpLs ùY°«PXôm.