Wednesday, January 8, 2020


How E.V.R’s anti-Tamil and C.N.A’s pro-Tamil created

 

a new kind of language drug, killing innumerable youth from the poor Tamils, Tamil & Tamil Music?




Nowhere in this world one can come across two leaders; one anti-mother tongue & the other pro-mother tongue, but claiming to be a double-barreled shotgun in ideology.

Splitting ‘Dravidar Kazhagam’ (DK, a non-political party,) led by E.V.Ramasamy (E.V.R), C.N.Annadurai (C.N.A) started DMK as a political party and declared that both the parties would function like a double-barreled shotgun in ideology. In 1967 C.N.A became the chief minister of Tamilnadu (TN) and travelled in the opposite direction with respect to Tamil; like oppositely directed double-barreled shotgun.

As CM, C.N.A erected statues for ancient Tamil poets in Chennai, including ‘Kambar’ who authored ‘KambarAmAyaNam’. Earlier C.N.A had propagated the need for burning ‘KambarAmAyaNam’, concurring with EVR. Both EVR and C.N.A were demanding the separation of Tamilnadu from India. To the best of my knowledge, C.N.A did not offer any meaningful explanation for reversing his stand and erecting the statue, honoring Kambar.

In his book ‘“தாய்ப் பால் பைத்தியம்(mother tongue madness), E.V.Ramasamy (E.V.R) explained his reasons for branding Tamil as a ‘barbarian language’ (காட்டுமிராண்டி மொழி), and why the progress of Tamils needed the replacement of Tamil by English.

Unfortunately, the Tamil scholars close to E.V.R failed to refute his arguments against the ancient Tamil texts. Hence the unbelievable social energy developed by E.V.R damaged Tamil & Tamil identity, while encouraging anti-India identity.

While the precolonial diverse identity all over in India was undergoing the transformation towards the anti-colonial Indian identity, Tamilnadu witnessed anti-India identity with the ambiguous ‘Dravidar, Dravida, (oppositely directed double-barreled shotgun) Tamil’ identity.

The contribution of Rajaji as the Chief Minister in 1937 thorough compulsory Hindi in schools for the eruption of the separatist demand in TN, deserved serious attention. (‘Is the Language Policy derailing the nation building process in India?’; http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2017/06/is-language-policy-derailing-nation.html)

The following statement in the Indian Constitution Assembly was delivered, by the  nationalist. T.T. Krishnamachari:

“This kind of intolerance makes us fear that the strong Centre which we need, a strong Centre which is necessary will also mean the enslavement of people who do not speak the language of the legislature, the language of the Centre. I would, Sir, convey a warning on behalf of the people of the South for the reason that there are already elements in South India who want separation and it is up to us to tax the maximum strength we have to keeping those elements down, and my honourable friends in U.P. do not help us in anyway by flogging their idea ‘Hindi Imperialism’ to the maximum extent possible.”- T.T. Krishnamachari; http://www.languageinindia.com/april2006/constituentassemblylastdays.pdf )

Before Independence Rajaji supported the ‘Dravida Nadu Separation’ demand of EVR.

"We going to soon get the cooperation of my friend and comrade, Acharya (Rajagopalachari), for the separation of Dravida Nadu. Not only him, but all Brahmins ... are going to support our demand for separation"- Periyar EVR ; http://en.wikiedia.org/wiki/C._R._formula

After Independence, in the 1952 general election of the Madras Presidency, the Congress Party contested in 367 seats and won 152.  MuthuRamalinga Devar, a staunch pro- INA nationalist tried to form the govt, grouping all non-congress MLAs. (https://ta.wikipedia.org/wiki/) De-railing MuthuRamalinga Devar’s efforts and introducing the political disease of defection, Rajaji became the CM. No surprise; from Mudukulaththur to recent anti-caste riots in TN; after the declassification of the documents with the intelligence agencies in India and abroad, hidden truths come out exonerating MuthuRamalinga Devar, a victim of the then PM Nehru’s conspiracy, from anti-dalit label.

Rajaji was mainly responsible for strengthening anti-Indian pro-Tamil Identity in Tamilnadu and DMK capturing power in 1967 and M.K becoming CM in 1969. Rajaji’s role was pro-active and E.V.R’s role was reactive. (http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2019/11/rajiv-malhotra-prof.html)

The period of Kamaraj as CM supported by EVR witnessed pro-Indian identity growth. But it was disrupted by C.N.A and Rajaji by instigating the 1965 anti-Hindi agitation, while EVR opposed it. C.N.A distancing from EVR’s anti-Brahmin, anti-Tamil, atheist ideology, succeeded in appropriating the social energy developed by EVR. Hence the 1965 anti-Hindi agitation marked the irrelevance of EVR in TN political scene. Hence in 1967, C.N.A became the C.M of TN. After his death in 1969, Karunanidhi succeeded him and transformed DMK into his family party.

From 1967 till the death of EVR, DK and DMK functioned like the oppositely directed double-barreled shotgun with respect to Tamil.

The Tamil identity bungling of EVR benefited DMK to appropriate the social energy of E.V.R, and subjugate anti-India Tamil identity to selfish political interests of DMK.

Fooled by the colonial mischief of the semantic distortion of the Tamil word ‘inam’ (இனம்), replacing the original meaning with the racial anti-Brahmin meaning, both EVR & C.N.A strengthened anti-India identity with the ambiguous ‘Dravidar, Dravida, Tamil’ identity.

The anti-India Tamil identity, divorced the Tamil intellectual dimension, encouraging emotional opposition to Sanskrit, identifying Sanskrit only with Vedas & Brahmins. Probably had E.V.R been aware that of all the ancient languages including Tamil, “Sanskrit and Pali have a larger atheistic and agnostic literature than any other classical language” ( Page 35, ‘Identity and Violence’ by Amartya Sen), he might not have encouraged the anti-Sanskrit phobia in Tamilnadu. 

But for this development, Karunanidhi could not have succeeded in sidelining real Tamil scholars, subjugating Tamil to serve his selfish interests. During his last period as CM, posters depicting great ancient Tamil poets TholkAppiar, Thiruvalluvar, and Ilango standing & saluting Karunanidhi in sitting posture; later enacted in the stage at Valluvar Kottam, Chennai. There were no protests, confirming the subjugation of Tamil & pro-Tamil scholars and forums.

Students involved in the1965 anti-Hindi agitation were Tamil medium educated. They would not have tolerated the above nonsense. Now most of the college students of Tamil families were English medium educated, and could not fluently read and write in Tamil. Hence there were no student protests against the above nonsense.

Also, the following may also be a reason for Karunanidhi’s foolish courage to indulge in the above mockery.

The period of M.G.R as CM of TN witnessed the weakening of the DMK’s subjugated anti-India Tamil identity, benefitting Tamil in many ways including a role model university for Tamil. Jayalalitha (JJ) as CM, derailed it by imprisoning herself in Sasikala family, facilitating Sasikala’s husband Natarajan to emerge as a pro-Tamil patron, fooling anti-Karunanidhi Tamil scholars. My efforts to draw the attention of JJ to my ThirukkuRaL related research could not succeed for the same reason. Since my research proved the pitfalls in Karunanidhi’s ThirukkuRaL commentary,  Sasikala- Natarajan with probable secret links with Karunanidhi, might have played a mischievous role, I suspected.

DMK’s subjugated anti-India Tamil identity, divorced the Tamil intellectual dimension and strengthened the emotional dimension transforming it to a new kind of anti-India, anti-Sanskrit, Tamil chauvinistic language drug; ‘Dravidian Blue Whale social menace’ - http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2017/09/spreading-blue-whale-in-tn-corruption.html 

Symptoms of the above drug: 1. Fear to call the name of the leader not only in public even in private conversation, but disrespecting scholars and the system due to the social infection of Dunning-Kruger effect (note below) 2. Lack of intellectual strength & hence to escape from intellectual debates, brand the other person as Brahmin’s stooge. 3. Closing the eyes to even snatching of the private property by threat or killing, looting the lakes, rivers, hills, forest etc in TN – all forms of Dravida corruption; 4. Taking part or supporting agitations damaging public & private property & public life; 5. Blind opposition to Sanskrit; 6. Supporting the foreign funded NGOs. 7. Unique symptom of ‘Periyar’ brand drug, included supporting EVR calling Tamil as ‘barbarian language’, and advising Tamils to replace Tamil by English even in their daily life. 

As the resultant of the above social ills, Tamil & Tamil music are becoming object of ridicule in the world of scholars, due to the resulting decay in the intellectual domain. 
(http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2019/09/blog-post_16.html  & http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2019/03/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none_25.html)

Also, I had explained the social mechanism indulged by Karunanidhi to exploit both anti-Brahmin & pro-Brahmin groups to serve his corrupt goals. (http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2019/10/blog-post.html) Also both brahmins and non-brahmins had become the victims of the above mechanism. (https://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2014/12/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none_10.html) 

Unaware of this mischievous mechanism, anti-EVR groups in TN BJP now serve the selfish goals of DMK. 
(‘Why it may accelerate the breaking of Tamilnadu from India?’; http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2019/11/rajiv-malhotra-prof.html )

The social disruption, depression, suicide, drug use, disrespecting the elders, etc currently witnessed among the educated youth in TN, may be due to the above damages caused by E.V.R unaware of his intellectual limitations w.r.t the study of the ancient Tamil texts. 

 “Because of the close links between language and identity, if people begin to think of their language as useless, they see their identity as such as well. This leads to social disruption, depression, suicide and drug use, he says. And as parents no longer transmit language to their children, the connection between children and grandparents is broken and traditional values are lost.” (http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8311000/8311069.stm)


Starting from 1965 all the suicides adored by the Dravida/Tamil parties till the recent suicides of chenkodi, Anita, innumerable suicides had taken place; none of them belonging to the families of Dravida/Tamil parties; without exception, almost all belonged to the poor families, mostly first generation educated.

The separation demand ‘Tamilnadu for Tamils’, weakened the developing Indian identity among the Tamils; while precolonial diverse identity all over in India was undergoing the transformation towards the anti-colonial Indian identity. (http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2019/11/rajiv-malhotra-prof.html) 

Only through the social dynamics of the identity related social energy development, one can understand the magnitude of this ambiguous identity related damage in TN. I had come across researches on the social identity related problems (See the note below). Hence I recommend a doctoral research on ‘The damages due to the ambiguous anti-India Dravidar/Dravida/oppositely directed double-barreled shotgun Tamil identity’. Also, I am willing to share my expertise for such research projects.

‘Tamilnadu may be the only state in India, and the only region in the world, where mother tongue Tamil, Tamil literature & Tamil traditions, were humiliated & condemned, and the individual centered unfettered western enjoyment values, were adored, in the name of ‘Periyar’ EVR style ‘rationalism’, capturing the state power in 1967, by subordinating reason to ‘Tamil sentiment intoxication’  in the process; a kind of ‘Dravidian Blue Whale social menace’ that damaged hills, rivers, lakes, sands, forest wealth, mother tongue Tamil & native traditions, projecting ‘Tamil sentimental cheats’ to dominate in the public domain.

Dismantling of the joint family & disrespecting the traditional values, while worshiping individual-centered unfettered western enjoyment values, along with the above- mentioned corruption;
are the social catalysts to such Blue Whale games.

Like combating terrorism, the social fight against the Blue whale game shall encompass the fight against the corruption as well as the declining traditional values, resulting in weakening the social supervision of the college students and the social shock absorption of the joint family system. (‘Spreading Blue Whale in TN; Corruption & declined Tradition as Social Catalysts’; http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2017/09/spreading-blue-whale-in-tn-corruption.html )



Note: 

"The Dunning-Kruger effect is a type of cognitive bias in which people believe that they are smarter and more capable than they really are. Essentially, low ability people do not possess the skills needed to recognize their own incompetence.";  
https://www.verywellmind.com/an-overview-of-the-dunning-kruger-effect-4160740

“Depending on which social identity is salient in a given situation in the policy process, actors’ preferences and behavior align with this identity. Assessing these allows the researcher to explain conflict and cooperation between policy actors, policy actors’ preferences, behavior, and decisions, as well as policy outcomes.” https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11077-018-9340-6


‘Any sort of changes or role losses that demand flexibility of one's identity or the capacity to step back a bit and suspend one's characteristic habits or identity manifestations will precipitate manic or depressive episodes in such predisposed melancholics’ (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7677200)


‘Social Identity as Social Phenomenon and Scientific Concept’; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057%2F9780230605671_2


‘Multiple Identities in Social Perception and Interaction: Challenges and Opportunities’;  http://www-2.rotman.utoronto.ca/facbios/file/KangBodenhausen_ReviewinAdvance.pdf


‘Ambiguity, Social Influence, and Collective Action: Generating Collective Protest in Response to Tokenism’; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01461672972312005

No comments:

Post a Comment