‘Periyar’ parties’ ipso facto rejection of EVR

   LTTE Prabakaran replacing ‘Periyar’ E.V.R in Tamilnadu?

During the 50^th anniversary of Thuglak programme, Rajni cited the 1971 Salem DK anti-Hindu Gods procession related Thuglak ban by then CM Karunanidhi, as the boost for Thuglak circulation. The violent criticisms opposing Rajni & foiled bomb attack on Thuglak editor Gurumurthy implied ‘Periyar’ parties’ ipso facto rejection of EVR who till his death did not meet criticism with violence. Any doubt? Read Jayakanthan’s experience of criticizing EVR in front of him on the stage. 

Communist leader D.Raja had similar experience when he criticized Thuglak in front of Cho on the stage, as shown in the following link.

https://m.facebook.com/groups/212853082226443?view=permalink&id=1439687589542980&sfnsn=wiwspwa&extid=osYbZ5oYgXoC94IP&d=w&vh=i

 

Both E.V.R and Thuglak encouraged criticisms on their stage. If ‘Periyar’ parties resorted to violence and agitation to meet the criticisms, will it not mean ‘Periyar’ parties’ ipso facto rejection of EVR.

The social disease of meeting the criticism with killing was introduced by LTTE Prabakaran. Those who criticized him both within LTTE as well as outside from different Elam groups, were brutally killed. Many TULF leaders including Amirthalingam, TELO, PLOT, EPRLF, etc leaders and trained militants in those groups were killed. An objective assessment of the killing of Elam liberation leaders and their trained cadres, may rank Prabakaran above Rajapaksa. Now ‘Periyar’ parties seemed to be infected with that social disease.

Interestingly, some pro-LTTE parties in TN had started criticizing E.V.R.  Unlike E.V.R’s ‘Periyar image balloon’, Prabakaran’s ‘mAveeran image balloon’ can easily be pricked by criticism to burst it. Even to counter pro-LTTE parties’ criticism of E.V.R, ‘Periyar parties’ fail to criticize Prabakaran, suggesting their servile to Prabakaran, and misusing ‘Periyar’ as a mask to fool TN. Late E.V.R’s  welcoming criticisms, and EVR’s yardstick for public life, would be incompatible with late LTTE Prabakaran’s approach.(http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2016/10/blog-post.html) 

Hence, after relinquishing E.V.R’s stand on violence to support LTTE, E.V.R was misused as a mask by the ‘Periyar’ parties; draining the goodwill for E.V.R among the public to encourage the anti-EVR chauvinists both in pro & anti Hindutva circles. 
(http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2018/11/5.html)

During 1980s, when then PM Indira Gandhi started encouraging Elam separatist groups to serve her selfish political interests, LTTE was trailing behind TELO (supported by DMK), PLOTE (supported by a section of DK). The present ‘Periyar’ parties’ leaders were aware of my role in strengthening LTTE to overtake TELO & PLOTE. During those periods, I was in the circle of Anton Balasingham, Professors Nirmala & Nithiyanandam. When the journalist Anita Pratap (if my memory is right) wanted to interview Prabakaran, she was told that she had to submit her questions and answers would be delivered to her. All the answers were written by Balasingham, and the interview was published with world wide attention, serving as the first boost to building Prabakaran’s image balloon. In my view, of all the LTTE leaders I had met, Prabakaran was the least intelligent, who could not even understand the answers in that interview. As Prabakaran started exhibiting megalomaniac tendencies, Nirmala & Nithiyanandam discussed it with Balasingham in my presence. As Balasingham was suggesting patience to handle Prabaharan, Nirmala exclaimed “Is he a baby to handle?”. Later Nirmala, Nithiyanandam and Raghavan, one of the founder leaders of LTTE, left LTTE, and I started distancing myself from LTTE. 

In fact, such unhappy experiences forced me to quit my public life and divert to music research. To my surprise, my research applying ‘Physics of Music’ to the ancient Tamil texts, revealed how E.V.R was wrong on the ancient Tamil texts, and how he contributed to a complex psychological Tamil Identity distortion related social diseases in TN. (https://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2020/01/how-e.html) As a result, E.V.R had become a victim during the 1965 anti-Hindi agitation and later becoming a ‘Periyar mask’ for the ‘Periyar’ parties worshipping Prabakaran; to silence those opposing them with violence including killing. 

Reactions of the ‘Periyar’ parties to the Rajni’s above mentioned comment, suggest their addiction to argumentum ad hominem. (refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem )

Commenting on the 2009 election results after the mullivaikkal tragedy;

“The outcome of the recent elections in Tamil Nadu has been the defeat of the most faithful of the LTTE touts in India. These financial orphans of the LTTE have been thoroughly exposed because Tamilians do not care for the LTTE, contrary to media projections. The common joke today is that 'Puligal' (Tigers) have been reduced to 'Eligal' (Rats) because they (the LTTE) have had to hide in holes in the ground to try save themselves.” - Dr. Subramanian Swamy (https://www.news18.com/blogs/india/dr-subramanian-swamy/sri-lanka-post-ltte-12212-744210.html)

LTTE supporter Vaiko who praised Prabakaran as ‘mAveeran (great hero)’, after the death of Jayalalitha, hailed Sasikala as ‘veera mangai vElu nAchchiyAr (famous freedom fighter Tamil king vElu nAchchiyAr)’. With the support of pro-LTTE, pro-EVR, & anti-Hindutva leaders, Sasikala surrendered to Dr. Subramanian Swamy to become the CM of TN, unmindful of Dr.S.S calling LTTE as ‘Elis (rats)’ and 'chauvinist' Tamils as ‘porki’.

“One of the ways to recognise a porki is if his or her language is vulgar hard porn, threatens violence but runs away on retaliation“ - Dr. Subramanian Swamy (http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2017/02/) 

Those who have intellectual fear to respond to criticisms, and resort to violence are both ‘Eli & Porki’ -two-in-one. 

The following evidence suggest that Subramanian Swamy may be emulating E.V.R, as advised by Kanchi ‘Parmacharya’.

“Ironically, in one of his tutorials to me by Parmacharya, God on earth, he said Periyar EVR had kept his vow to his parents to maintain the ancestral temple in Erode, which temple received first prize for the best maintained temple for years. Parmacharya also told me to learn from Periyar EVR how one man can change the thinking of crores of people with nothing but ideas.”

Only persons with a good ‘akam - அகம்’ and intellectual honesty could identify the human ‘Eli & porki’ worshipped by their ignorant followers. (‘The keys in ‘akam’ and ‘puRam’;  The innumerable mysterious treasures in the Nature and Society’; https://veepandi.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-keys-in-akam-and-puram-innumerable.html)

Periyar EVR, probably due to his lack of education, could not understand the multidimensional value of the Indian ‘purAnAs’ (religious stories), like many western writers ignorant of it, and hence missed the intellectual content in those texts.( http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2014/10/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none_10.html)

I doubt if ‘Periyar’ parties’ leaders have the moral courage and the intellectual strength of justifying EVR in 1971 Salem DK anti-Hindu God procession and burning of the picture of Ram, in EVR style. 

Will DK refute & publish a rejoinder to the following article in their journal 'The Modern Rationalist'?

‘The Psychological Damage Periyar’s Pseudo-Rationalism Did To Tamil Nadu’; https://swarajyamag.com/ideas/the-psychological-damage-periyars-pseudo-rationalism-did-to-tamil-nadu

 

LTTE Prabakaran seems to be replacing ‘Periyar’ E.V.R in Tamilnadu, fooling few of the mostly first generation educated youth by ‘affluent’ leaders with no transparency and accountability with respect to the financial sources for such anti-India activities.

‘Those making ‘loud anti-Brahmin & anti-Hindutva’ noises in Tamilnadu, can be categorized into two groups; one leading upper middle class & affluent life, and other mostly semi-literate leading lower middle class mostly from the poor families in the villages or slums in the city.

Unfortunately, the latter category could not probe, who all in the former category were the beneficiaries of foreign donors like Oxfam, Ford foundation, etc or linked to the ‘corrupt’ political leaders in India.’ 

(http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2018/04/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none_98.html) 

Starting from 1965 all the suicides adored by the Dravida/Tamil parties till the recent suicides of chenkodi, Anita, innumerable suicides had taken place; none of them belonging to the families of Dravida/Tamil parties; without exception, almost all belonged to the poor families, mostly first generation educated. 

Taminadu is witnessing ‘Dravida corrupt Carcass eagle’ with one ‘anti-Hindutva’ wing of silencing the criticisms by branding the opponents as ‘Brahmin’s stooges’ & threatening them with violence;

and another ‘pro-Hindutva’ wing for sharing power with the BJP at the central govt. (http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2018/03/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none_26.html) 

Interestingly, why should there be so many small parties with Prabakaran as their role model for all such parties? It may suggest the ‘war among themselves’, probably for those financial sources. 

I had revealed how the separatist social forces in TN corrupted the Elam liberation groups to the damage of Tamilnadu. (http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2017/02/blog-post_19.html) Also, I had explained how to undo the damages. (http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2018/04/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none_17.html  & http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2018/04/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none_98.html) 

From the reactions to Rajni’s comment on 1971 Salem anti-Hindu Gods procession, I infer that the ‘Periyar image balloon’ protection to the ‘Dravida Corruption’ seemed to be threatened by the comment. But till his death, E.V.R encouraged open criticisms and morality in public life. (http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2016/10/blog-post.html )

 

Time has come for a serious probe to verify if the absence of serious scholarly challenges to Periyar EVR, after the Birth of DK in 1944,  had  caused an unique social mechanism enabling lumpen elements to rise up in the social ladder to become wealthy and powerful under the garb of  ‘anti-Brahmin Tamil sentiments’. Also, the probe shall include the role of the negative emotions in fooling the otherwise well-educated persons to encourage the above ‘lumpen elements.

If the followers of Periyar EVR & ‘anti-Hindu’ pro-Western intellectuals could come out of their mental prison, and wake up to the new findings, all antagonistic divisions, encouraged by the foreign funded NGOs,  will vanish. (http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.com/2014/10/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none_10.html)