The Common Pitfall of Marxism & Capitalism
“ While theories of Karl Marx saw the non-corporate
economy, including family farming, as private capitalist, the capitalist
theories did not see it as either capitalist or socialist but saw it as just a
transient reality moving towards demise. This is where theories of both Marx
and Market proved wrong. In theory and practice, small farms and small
businesses were neither socialist nor capitalist.”
From ‘Deng Xiaoping Devised What was Suitable for Mainland China’ by
http://www.newindianexpress.com/columns/Deng-Xiaoping-Devised-What-was-Suitable-for-Mainland-China/2015/02/20/article2677556.ece
Every
human activity is multidimensional from which the revenue generation cannot be
separated out, and dealt as an independent activity, another aspect that might
have escaped the attention of the both Marxist & Capitalist macro-economic theories.
Interestingly, a significant source of Karl Marx writings was Adam Smith,
suggesting a common pitfall. (http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2662349?sid=21105400861431&uid=3738328&uid=4&uid=2&uid=70&uid=2129
)
Hence
the ‘appropriation of the surplus product’ dealt in ‘Das Capital’ & ‘Theories of surplus-value’,
deserves further research, taking into account the above identified short falls.
The starting point may be ‘ Is globalization a new
Marxist Avatar? (Or Heterogeneous Societies and the Mode of Production)’
in http://tamilsdirection.blogspot.in/2014/11/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none_18.html post dt. December 4, 2013.
The writings of
No comments:
Post a Comment